Physical outcome
evidencedReuse intact, refurbishment and reuse, component harvesting, recycling, destruction, and residual waste remain separate attributable outcomes.
Trust + governance
Physical circularity outcomes must be attributable, mass-reconciled, and evidence-backed before they can support environmental accounting, reporting, assurance, or public claims.
The operating doctrine for proving physical reuse, refurbishment, component harvesting, recycling, destruction, residual waste, and material recovery; reconciling represented material outcomes to asset mass; and keeping environmental accounting, reporting, assurance, and claims in their proper evidence states.
Reuse intact, refurbishment and reuse, component harvesting, recycling, destruction, and residual waste remain separate attributable outcomes.
Represented material outcomes reconcile to governed asset mass with unresolved and contradictory mass visible.
Accepted evidence can support authoritative outcome calculations while unverified evidence remains excluded.
Emissions and environmental-benefit calculations use their own governed data, methodology, scope, and uncertainty.
Reporting packages, regulatory interpretation, external assurance, and public claims remain distinct maturity states.
An approved recycling, reuse, repair, or recovery recommendation does not become physical truth until attributable accepted evidence supports what actually happened.
Material outcomes are compared with governed asset-mass evidence. Missing mass remains unresolved and impossible over-recovery becomes a contradiction.
Downstream evidence can be retained for investigation without entering authoritative circularity calculations until it meets the required evidence threshold.
Physical outcome evidence does not automatically establish environmental benefit, avoided emissions, carbon offsets, regulatory compliance, CSRD/ESRS assurance, or any other stronger public claim.
Reuse intact, refurbishment and reuse, component harvesting, recycling, destruction, and residual waste remain separate attributable outcomes.
Represented material outcomes reconcile to governed asset mass with unresolved and contradictory mass visible.
Accepted evidence can support authoritative outcome calculations while unverified evidence remains excluded.
Emissions and environmental-benefit calculations use their own governed data, methodology, scope, and uncertainty.
Reporting packages, regulatory interpretation, external assurance, and public claims remain distinct maturity states.
These are the kinds of records the operating model must preserve or produce. Availability depends on the product workflow, configured providers, and the event being evidenced.
No. Recommendation and observed physical outcome are separate governed states. Accepted attributable evidence is required before recycling becomes authoritative truth.
Physical Outcome IntelligenceMissing mass remains unresolved, while claimed recovered mass above the governed source mass becomes a contradiction rather than a rounded success.
Physical Outcome IntelligenceNo. Physical outcome, environmental accounting, reporting, external assurance, and public claim each require their own governed basis.
Environmental methodologyIt can be retained for investigation, but it stays outside authoritative calculations until it satisfies the required evidence rules.
Downstream governanceITAD Lens carries the asset from intended disposition through observed outcome, mass reconciliation, environmental accounting, reporting, assurance, and any later permitted claim without collapsing those stages into one green label.